The High Court of Delhi dismissed the appeal and made the following observations in the case:
The mere fact that the respondent wife is earning does not absolve the petitioner of his responsibility to maintain his three minor daughters. It was also noted by the Court that the Petitioner is a businessman and had a good source of income as no reason or material has been placed on record by the petitioner to even prima facie show that he is incapable or incapacitated from earning.
While allowing the interim maintenance to the wife, the Court was of the view that the Petitioner has a legal, social and moral responsibility to not only maintain his wife but also his children. Even if assuming that the respondent is earning, the same cannot be a reason for the petitioner to avoid the responsibility and duty of maintaining his minor daughters.
That a child for her upbringing does not only require money. A lot of time and effort goes in the upbringing of a child. It would be incorrect to hold that both the parents are equally responsible for the expenses of the child. A mother who has custody of a child not only spends money on the upbringing of the child but also spent substantial time and effort in bringing up the child. One cannot put value to the time and effort put in by the mother in upbringing of the child.
That no doubt, mother, if she is earning, should also contribute towards the expenses of the child but the expenses cannot be divided equally between the two. However, merely because the Respondent wife is earning, does not give an excuse to the husband to avoid working or undertake the responsibility of maintaining his children.
Note:- We try our level best to avoid any kind of abusive content posted by users. Kindly report to us if you notice any. This report may be copied from a news/channel/magazine/blog/site for knowledge sharing, where PathLegal DISCLAIM any ownership of the content posted and offer NO warranty about the data. In case of any objection, please do write to email@example.com