Google Play App Store

Legal NewsNews Legal BlogsLaw Blogs Branding BlogsJudgements Branding BlogsBranding Blogs All Legal News and BlogsAll Blogs Legal JobsLegal Jobs

List Of Leading Cases And Short Notes Given By Mr. F.S Nariman List Of Leading Cases And Short Notes Given By Mr. F.S Nariman

Bronze medal Reporter Adv Rose Posted 13 Apr 2019 Read More News and Blogs
List Of Leading Cases And Short Notes Given By Mr. F.S Nariman

1. T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka (2002) 8 sec 481: AIR 2003 SC 3,55 (11l) P~A. Inamder vs. State of Maharastra - 2005 (6) -sec 537 (7l) overruling Islamic Academy 2003 (6) sec ˇ697 (5J)

2. P.A. Inamdar v. State of Maharashtra: 2004 (8) sec 139-(23) referring to larger Bench

3. Minerva Mills v. Union of India: 1980 (3) sec 625 (5J) - Parliament has limited amending power - which is a basic structure of the Constitution para 17 and 88

4. S.R. Bommal v. UOI: 1994 (3) sec 1- (9l) - Federalism I Secularism Artlc'e; 3':56 and Floor test.

5. . L. Chandra Kumar v. UOI: 1995 (1) sec 400 c' (7l) - validity of Administrative Tribunal Act 1965/ struck down 99th Constitutional Amendment referred to larger Bench. (not in course) 1997 (3) sec 261 (7l) - held Article 323 A(2)(d) and 3238 (d) unconstitutional ludici-al Review is basic structure of the Constitution.

6. Supreme Court Advocate-on-Record Association v. UOI: 1993 (4) sec 441 (9J) follow in NJAC Case.

7. Samsher Singh v. State of punjab: 1974 (2) sec 831: (7]) Function of President/Governor with aid and advice of Council of Ministers.

8. Bangalore Water Supply 8r.. Sewerage Board v. ~"- (1 A. Rajappa: 1979 (2) SCC 213 (5J}-Industry now referred to larger Benchin Bir Singh.

9~ Maneka Gandhi v. UOI: 1978 (1) sec 248: (7J) - Article 21 Right to travel abroad (Article 14, 19 and 21)

10. A.R. Antulay v. R.S.Nayak: 1988 (2) SCC602 (7J): s.~herent power to rectify its error.

11. Rupa Ashok Hurra v. Ashok Hurra: 2002 (4) SCC388 (5J): - curative petition can be filed after dismissal of review petition.

12. Indra Sawhney v. UOI: 1992 Supp.(3) SCC 217 (9J) - Mandai Commission - Creamy _--------I-aiyer test evolved.

13. Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan: 1997 (6) sec 241: (3l) - Sexual herassmerrref guidelines .

14. Pradeep Kumar Biswas v. Indian Institute of Chemical Biology: 2002 (5) sec' 111 (73)- 'State' - Council of 1Scientifkc.

15. SBP & Co. vs. Patel Engg. Ltd.: 2005 (8) sec 618 (7]) (6:1) - Power u/section 11(6) of Arbitration Act by Chief Justice @f crudicial power.

16. I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu: 2007 (2) see 1 (9J) - All Amendments after April '-. 1973 to be tested on basic structure doctrine.

17. Ashoka Kumar Thakur v. UOI: 2008 (6) see 1 (5J) - O'BCreservatlons valid but question as to whether they applied to private un-aided educational institutiol)Slett open.

18. CBSEv. Adˇitya Bandopadhyay: 2011 (8) sec () 497 2J Ieh t ~ - ~f - Rig t to In.ormatlon faclet. Article 19(1)(a)-evaluating answer books ef 8f.:J Public examination.

19. Swamy Shraddananda (2) v. State of Karnataka: 2008 (13) see 767 (3l) para 98 and 99 - Sentence of Imprisonment for life

20. Nandini Sundar v. State of Chattisgarh: 2011 (13) sec 46 (2J) - Right of rehabilitation of tribals under Articl~ 21, 46, 300A.

21. Selvi v. State of Karnataka: 2010 (7) see 263: (3J~ Lie detector test and Brain prof~ test) violates rigl)t to fair trial (Article 21)



22. Amarinder Singh v. Punjab Vidhan Sabha: 2010 (6) sec 113 (SJ)-Power and Privileges of State and Parliament Legislature - oKM.

23. State of West Bengal v. Committee for the Protection of Democratic Rights: 2010 (3) ~ SCC571 (5J): S.C.and H.C

24. Kihota Hollohan v, ZachiHhu: 1992

25. Centre for Public Interest Litigation v. UOI: 2012 (2) Scale 180: 2012 (3) SCC 1 (2l)- Public trust doctrine (2G Cases).

26. In re: Special Reference NO.1 of 2012- 28&,2 (10).

27. Mafataial Industries Ltd u. . ˇ v. n.on of India 1997 (5) see (9J)-unjust enrichment

28. Vodafone International Holdings BV v. Union of India (2012) 6 see 613 (3l)

29. Zahira Habibulla H. Sheikh v. State of Gujarat (2004) 4 sec 158 (2l)

30. Malay Kumar Ganguly v. Dr. sukumar Mukherjee (2009) 9 see 221 (2l) - a case of Medical Negligence. Heavy costs awarded~ the Hospital and deeter.

You can refer to lawyers in India for more details.


Click on the image to read more about SC NEW RULING: NO BAR IN JURISDICTION FOR SECTION 498A DOWRY HARASSMENT CASE

Note:- We try our level best to avoid any kind of abusive content posted by users. Kindly report to us if you notice any, pathlegal@gmail.com

Copyright @ Pathmpor Consultants Pvt Ltd

F

r

e

e


A

d

v

i

c

e