Google Play App Store

Legal NewsNews Legal BlogsLaw Blogs Branding BlogsJudgements Branding BlogsBranding Blogs All Legal News and BlogsAll Blogs Legal JobsLegal Jobs

What Happens When Accused Gives False Testimony During Trial? What Happens When Accused Gives False Testimony During Trial?

Bronze medal Reporter Names Posted 7 Oct 2020
What Happens When Accused Gives False Testimony During Trial?

Accused is given an opportunity to place his/her version in a case as this is a right of accused provided under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. If a false claim is made intentionally in a judicial proceeding then, the person is liable to be punished.

Let us look under Indian Penal Code:

  • “Section 191-Giving false evidence;
  • Section 193-Punishment for false evidence;
  •  Section 195 –Giving or fabricating false evidence with intent to procure conviction of offence punishable with imprisonment for life or imprisonment;
  • Section 196 –Using evidence known to be false;
  • Section 199-False statement made in declaration which is by law receivable as evidence;
  • Section 209-Dishonestly making false claim in Court.”

Now, let us see under Code of Criminal Procedure:

  • “Section 195-Prosecution for contempt of lawful authority of public servants, for offences against public justice and for offences relating to documents given in evidence;
  • Section 340 -Procedure in cases mentioned in section 195.”

Perjury or intentionally making false claims under oath in Court under Section 209 of the Indian Penal Code require essential ingredients to constitute as an offence which are-

  • Once the accused has made a claim;
  • The claim made the accused is in the Court of law;
  • It can be that the claim made by an accused person is false either wholly or in part;
  • The false claim made by the accused was intentionally;
  • The false claim was made by accused in an intentional manner to injure any person

Then, again, it is up to the prosecution to establish that the accused had made a false claim. The claim made by defendants in a suit is also included in this. Making false claim misleads court, delays justice and abuse of process of law.

In Umrao Lal vs.State, the Allahabad High Court noted:

If the prosecution succeeds in proving that an accused in the witness box deliberately made two statements which are so contradictory to, and irreconcilable with, each other, that both cannot possibly be true, he can be convicted of perjury even without its being proved which one of them was not true. It has been held in - 'Queen-Empress v. Ghulet ', 7 All 44 (A); - 'Habibullah v. Queen-Empress ', 10 Cal 937 (B) and - 'Taj Mahomed v. Emperor' AIR 1928 Lah 125 at p. 128 (C) that an accused who is proved to have made two wholly irreconcilable statements can be convicted of perjury without its being shown which one of them was false.

3. Really the question is whether it is proved or not that the accused committed perjury; If he has made two statements which are so contradictory and irreconcilable that both cannot possibly be true, it means that one of them is false and if the other ingredients of the offence are made out, he can be convicted. It is only when the prosecution charges him with making a particular statement falsely, that it has to prove that that statement is false and not the other. In that case the mere fact and that he made the other statement conflicting with it would not suffice because it may very well be that the other statement was false and not the statement with which he was charged. When all that is proved is that one of the two statements is false, it means that it is not proved that a particular statement is false. If the accused is charged with making that statement falsely, naturally the charge must fail.” Further details to be provided by Lawyers in India.

Note:- We try our level best to avoid any kind of abusive content posted by users. Kindly report to us if you notice any, [email protected]

Copyright @ Pathmpor Consultants Pvt Ltd

F

r

e

e


A

d

v

i

c

e